Crude Above $100 Sends Inflation Odds On Fire — But Traders Still Bet On Fed Rate Cuts

URL has been copied successfully!

Something unusual is unfolding in inflation and interest-rate markets.

As oil prices surpass $100 a barrel amid the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a sharp contradiction is being priced in real time across prediction markets.

On one hand, traders are rapidly pricing a surge in inflation this month. On the other, they are still betting the Federal Reserve will move ahead with interest rate cuts in 2026.

Can the two predictions really hold simultaneously?

A Market Betting On ‘Transitory’ Again

Beneath the surface, markets appear to be resurrecting a word that defined the inflation debate in 2021: “transitory.”

According to Polymarket, the probability that the annual inflation rate for March will exceed 2.8% has jumped by about 45 percentage points to roughly 87%.

That sharp move suggests traders expect inflation to rise meaningfully from the current 2.4% level and drift further away from the Federal Reserve’s 2% target.

Yet the interest-rate outlook tells a very different story.

Chart: The Inflation Signal That Moved 45 Points Overnight

title=”polymarket-market-iframe”
src=”https://embed.polymarket.com/market?market=will-annual-inflation-increase-by-2pt8-in-march?via=FPw2LTR&theme=dark&creator=Piero91&width=500&height=700″
width=”500″
height=”700″
frameBorder=”0″>

Rate-Cut Bets Have Not Broken

Markets still heavily expect the Federal Reserve to cut rates this year.

Notably, the implied probability of at least one rate cut stands at 75%.

Prediction market data show a 28% probability of a single rate cut of 25 basis points this year. The probability of two cuts is also about 28%, while traders assign a 15% chance to three cuts and a 4% chance to four cuts.

Meanwhile, the probability of no rate cuts is only about 18%. Even lower than that, the odds of a Federal Reserve …

Full story available on Benzinga.com

Please follow us:
Follow by Email
X (Twitter)
Whatsapp
LinkedIn
Copy link

This post was originally published here