A good buy or ‘the most ridiculous IPO of 2026’: Anthropic’s debut will be a referendum on AI

URL has been copied successfully!
  • In today’s CEO Daily: Top takeaways from Anthropic’s long-awaited S-1.
  • The big leadership story: Microsoft offers buyouts to 27% of its workforce.
  • The markets: Mixed globally as traders await corporate earnings.
  • Plus: All the news and watercooler chat from Fortune.

Good morning. Anthropic has finally filed the paperwork for what could be the largest IPO of all time. My colleague Beatrice Nolan covers AI and has this smart piece. Here are some takeaways from me:

The risk factors. Every prospectus contains a section on risk factors. This one starts on page 26 and ends 94 pages later. Almost one-third of the entire filing is filled with glimpses of what could go wrong. If you thought the SpaceX S-1 filing read like a sci-fi thriller, brace yourself for the prose from this part of the tech universe. Along with citing pedestrian risks like a shortage of compute or a reliance on too few customers, the company says its products may “displace or eliminate jobs, may be misused or otherwise cause harm and may pose catastrophic or existential risks to humanity.” Even if the human race does survive Anthropic’s innovative technologies, the filing warns the scale of harm could be so big that no single insurer or “potentially the insurance industry in the aggregate” could cover the damage. And Anthropic tosses in the possibility that its models could develop “forms of sentience.” Set against that dystopian landscape, “possible nationalization” might sound more like a potential plus than a peril to some readers. 

The ownership structure. Thanks to Google, Meta, and a range of other tech companies that went public, we’ve gotten used to dual-class stock structures that give the public a share of the company without giving them any say in how it’s run. Anthropic takes this to another level. The IPO will create a “Class F” share to be held by an LLC that’s owned by the seven co-founders. That share alone will carry 50.1% of the vote, giving each co-founder a say over the controlling vote even if they give away 98% of their shares. Is that the kind of hubristic myth-of-genius move that often drives proxy firms and large shareholders crazy? You bet. But University of Florida research also found that tech companies that have gone public with more than one class of stock have outperformed single-class tech companies. Founders of hot companies retain control because they can. The message: If you don’t like it, don’t buy it.

The bottom line. Whether Anthropic is a good buy depends on a lot of factors, not least of which is the as-yet-unset price. While Morningstar is bullish that the leading AI labs are building economic moats, research firm New Constructs has dubbed it “the most ridiculous IPO of 2026.” SpaceX, which captured the hearts and minds of many a space traveler during its debut, is down almost 9% year to date. When Axios uploaded the S-1 to two frontier models, asking whether it was a good buy, Anthropic’s Claude Opus 5.5 said yes “at a sensible price;” OpenAI’s rival ChatGPT gave it a thumbs down. But most of the human beings I’ve interviewed regard this IPO as a referendum on the current prospects for AI, arguing that the public’s appetite for a piece of Anthropic could affect enthusiasm for the sector as a whole.

Contact CEO Daily via Diane Brady at diane.brady@fortune.com

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

Share this story:
Follow by Email
X (Twitter)
Whatsapp
LinkedIn
Copy link

This post was originally published here.