A reported Houthi demand for $51 billion and Saudi recognition as Yemen’s rulers has drawn a categorical denial from a senior Saudi official, leaving the account disputed rather than establishing an agreed price for ending hostilities.
The Wall Street Journal’s original report cited people briefed on discussions between Saudi Arabia and Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi rebels. It said the kingdom asked what would be required for a negotiated halt after attacks on Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea and Houthi territorial gains near the Bab al-Mandeb chokepoint.
What the $51 billion report says
The Houthis described the reported sum as compensation for years of Saudi strikes and a blockade, the people briefed on the discussions told the Journal. Other figures had come up since, according to the same account. Even within that report, $51 billion was not presented as a fixed current price or a payment Saudi Arabia had accepted.
Ynet also reported the $51 billion figure, explicitly attributing it to the Journal. That is a second published account of the same report, not independent confirmation from a second set of negotiating sources.
The Journal also reported that the Houthis wanted Saudi recognition as Yemen’s rulers. No recognition, settlement, payment or ceasefire is established by the reporting reviewed.
Saudi official rejects the account
Saudi Deputy Minister for Public Diplomacy Rayed Krimly rejected the report in a November 5 post on X, reproduced in Saudi newspaper Al Yaum and quoted by Al Arabiya.
“I categorically deny the claims published by The Wall Street Journal regarding demands made by this militia. All of this is pure fabrication by the writers or their alleged sources,” Krimly said, according to Al Arabiya’s English account. The original post’s Arabic text was reproduced in Al Yaum’s embedded post; direct access to X was unavailable during this review.
Krimly also emphasized that Yemen has an internationally recognized government. His denial directly contests the reported demands; it is not an announcement of a negotiated agreement.
A second dispute, not a confirmed alternative price
Hussain Albukhaiti, a Sanaa-based journalist described by The New Arab as close to the Houthis, separately disputed the reported figure and recognition request. His account is not treated here as a formal Houthi negotiating document or an independently verified replacement demand.
No confirmed end to Red Sea disruption
The Houthis are an Iran-backed armed movement in Yemen, on Saudi Arabia’s southern border. The disagreement over the report concerns both alleged financial compensation and political recognition, not an announced end to the conflict.
For shipowners and businesses using Red Sea routes, neither the reported demand nor its denial establishes that attacks or disruption have ended. Describing the figure as a confirmed “ransom” would go beyond the evidence.
JBizNews Desk | Global
© JBizNews.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction or redistribution is strictly prohibited.
