Global (Page 60)

By JBizNews Desk

JERUSALEM — The Bank of Israel’s Monetary Committee, led by Governor Prof. Amir Yaron, voted Monday, May 25, 2026, to lower the benchmark interest rate by 0.25 percentage points to 3.75% from 4.00%, citing easing inflation, a sharply stronger shekel, and resilient economic data that gave policymakers room to resume monetary easing despite ongoing regional instability.

The decision marks the central bank’s third cut since November 2025 and matched expectations from most economists and financial markets. The Bank of Israel had paused at its previous two meetings amid uncertainty surrounding the war with Iran, after delivering consecutive 0.25-point cuts in November and January.

In its policy statement, the Monetary Committee acknowledged that inflation has stabilized near the midpoint of the government’s official 1%–3% target range but warned that geopolitical and global inflationary pressures remain elevated. The committee said geopolitical uncertainty remains significant both domestically and globally, adding that while Israeli inflation has moderated, there has been a sharp increase in the global inflation environment since the previous rate decision.

Officials cautioned that risks remain for renewed inflation acceleration, citing energy prices, supply constraints, fiscal pressures, and regional developments tied to ongoing security concerns. At the same time, policymakers emphasized that the shekel’s rapid appreciation is helping offset inflationary pressures by lowering import costs and easing pressure on consumer prices.

The currency move has been dramatic. Since the previous interest-rate decision, the shekel strengthened 8.3% against the U.S. dollar, 7.2% against the euro, and 7.4% on a nominal effective exchange-rate basis, according to Bank of Israel data. The stronger currency has become one of the central bank’s most important disinflationary forces and a major factor allowing policymakers to continue cutting rates without triggering renewed price instability.

The central bank also addressed the economic impact of Operation Roaring Lion, Israel’s recent military campaign against Iran and Iranian-linked targets. According to the Bank of Israel, first-quarter 2026 GDP contracted at an annualized rate of 3.3%, reflecting disruptions tied to the operation and wartime economic conditions.

Still, officials emphasized that the downturn was milder than many economists had feared and less severe than the contraction experienced during Operation Rising Lion in June 2025. The committee said current indicators of economic activity point to recovery following Operation Roaring Lion. Officials noted that credit-card spending data, which declined during the military operation, has since rebounded and now sits slightly above the long-term trend line, signaling improving domestic demand and consumer activity.

The 0.25-point rate cut comes as central banks globally face increasingly difficult tradeoffs between slowing economic growth and persistent inflation concerns tied to energy markets and geopolitical disruptions. Israel’s situation has become particularly complex because the country is simultaneously managing wartime fiscal pressures, strong capital inflows, and a rapidly appreciating currency.

Markets reacted positively to the decision, with Israeli government bonds rising modestly and traders increasing expectations for at least one additional rate cut later this year if inflation continues cooling and geopolitical conditions stabilize.

Analysts say the Bank of Israel is attempting to engineer a delicate balancing act: supporting economic recovery after months of military disruptions while avoiding renewed inflation pressure from energy costs and wartime spending.

Governor Amir Yaron has repeatedly emphasized that future policy decisions will remain highly data dependent and closely tied to developments in both the security environment and global inflation trends.

For now, the central bank appears increasingly confident that the shekel’s strength and moderating domestic inflation are giving policymakers room to cautiously support growth — even as the broader Middle East remains on edge.

JBizNews Desk

© 2026 JBizNews. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.

Shares of Delivery Hero SE surged Tuesday after reports emerged that Uber Technologies Inc. is exploring a potential takeover of the German food-delivery giant, a move that could reshape the global online delivery industry and trigger one of the largest consolidation deals the sector has seen since the pandemic-era boom.

Delivery Hero shares jumped sharply in Frankfurt trading following the reports, adding billions of dollars in market value as investors reacted to speculation that Uber may be positioning itself to expand deeper into Europe, the Middle East, and Asia through a large-scale acquisition.

The reports come at a pivotal moment for the global delivery sector, where slowing growth, rising labor costs, and investor pressure for profitability have intensified consolidation expectations across the industry.

Delivery Hero operates food-delivery platforms in more than 70 countries and maintains particularly strong positions across Europe, the Middle East, Latin America, and parts of Asia. The company also holds stakes in several regional delivery businesses and quick-commerce operations.

Uber, meanwhile, has spent years aggressively expanding beyond ride-sharing into food delivery, grocery delivery, freight logistics, and broader local commerce services through its Uber Eats platform.

Industry analysts say a combination between Uber and Delivery Hero would dramatically expand Uber’s international delivery footprint while strengthening its position against competitors including DoorDash, Just Eat Takeaway, Meituan, Deliveroo, and Prosus-backed food delivery businesses.

The strategic logic behind such a transaction is increasingly clear.

Global food-delivery growth has slowed materially from the explosive levels seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, forcing companies to focus more heavily on scale, logistics efficiency, and profitability rather than pure customer acquisition. Investors have increasingly pushed management teams to reduce subsidies, cut marketing costs, and improve margins after years of aggressive expansion spending.

For Uber, acquiring Delivery Hero could provide instant scale in markets where Uber Eats remains weaker or fragmented, particularly across continental Europe and emerging international markets.

The potential deal would also likely attract heavy regulatory scrutiny.

Competition authorities in the European Union, the United Kingdom, and multiple international jurisdictions have already taken a far more aggressive stance toward technology mergers and platform consolidation over the past two years. Any large-scale Uber acquisition involving major delivery-market overlaps would likely face lengthy antitrust review processes.

Investors nevertheless reacted positively to the reports, viewing consolidation as one of the clearest paths toward stronger profitability in a sector that continues struggling with thin margins and intense promotional competition.

Delivery Hero has faced mounting pressure in recent years to improve financial performance after aggressive expansion into rapid grocery delivery and quick-commerce operations weighed heavily on earnings. The company has since pulled back from several markets and shifted more aggressively toward cash-flow improvement.

Uber Chief Executive Dara Khosrowshahi has repeatedly emphasized that the company is prioritizing profitable growth and operational scale following years of investor concern over cash burn and subsidy-heavy expansion strategies.

The broader market backdrop is also fueling takeover speculation.

Technology and platform companies globally are increasingly exploring acquisitions as lower interest-rate expectations, stabilizing capital markets, and pressure to accelerate growth encourage renewed merger activity.

For Europe specifically, a potential Uber-Delivery Hero transaction would represent one of the largest technology consolidation efforts in years and could significantly reshape the competitive balance across digital commerce, logistics, and local delivery infrastructure.

Neither Uber nor Delivery Hero publicly confirmed takeover discussions Tuesday.

Still, the sharp market reaction highlights how strongly investors believe further consolidation across the global food-delivery sector has become almost inevitable.

After years of expansion fueled by cheap capital and rapid pandemic growth, the industry is increasingly entering a new phase defined by scale, efficiency, and survival.

JBizNews Desk — Europe

© 2026 JBizNews. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.

By JBizNews Desk

America’s biggest banks are about to get significantly more powerful — and consumers, businesses, and investors are likely to feel the effects quickly.

Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman outlined the administration’s direction in a February 19 speech at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and in congressional testimony the following week: Washington is rolling back a series of post-2008 banking rules that have constrained lending capacity for more than a decade.

According to consulting firm Alvarez & Marsal, the changes could ultimately unlock roughly $2.6 trillion in additional lending capacity across the U.S. banking system — capital that has largely remained trapped on bank balance sheets since the global financial crisis.

The figure is enormous. It exceeds the annual economic output of many developed nations and represents one of the largest structural shifts in American banking policy since the aftermath of 2008.

The core of the deregulation effort centers around changes to the supplementary leverage ratio, one of the key post-crisis rules requiring large banks to maintain sizable capital cushions against potential losses. The Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation finalized a looser version of the framework late last year.

Alvarez & Marsal estimates the immediate impact alone could free approximately $140 billion in deployable capital at the eight largest U.S. banks. Additional revisions targeting stress-testing procedures, mortgage regulations, and portions of the broader Basel III banking framework are expected to follow.

The banking industry has openly welcomed the shift.

JPMorgan Chase Chief Executive Jamie Dimon, whose bank now holds roughly $4.42 trillion in assets, has argued for years that U.S. regulators overcorrected after the financial crisis and placed American lenders at a competitive disadvantage versus European and Asian rivals.

Goldman Sachs Chief Executive David Solomon publicly praised Bowman’s appointment last year, while Bank of America Chief Executive Brian Moynihan described the regulatory pivot as a meaningful boost for bank profitability and lending flexibility.

The question now is where the money goes.

A significant portion is expected to flow directly into artificial intelligence infrastructure. Until now, large banks have largely watched from the sidelines as private credit firms financed the rapid buildout of AI data centers, semiconductor facilities, cloud infrastructure, and energy projects tied to companies such as Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta Platforms, and Nvidia-linked suppliers.

With more balance-sheet flexibility, major banks are now positioning themselves to finance billions of dollars in new AI-related infrastructure projects.

Mortgage lending is another major target.

Speaking at the American Bankers Association community banking conference in Orlando earlier this year, Bowman previewed regulatory adjustments designed to make mortgage origination and servicing less expensive for traditional banks.

For years, many banks gradually retreated from the mortgage business as compliance burdens increased, allowing nonbank lenders to capture significant market share. Regulators now appear eager to reverse that trend in hopes of increasing credit availability for homebuyers.

The broader small-business economy could also benefit. Mid-sized manufacturers, regional businesses, and acquisition financing markets are expected to see expanded access to traditional bank credit after years in which private credit funds increasingly filled the gap.

The rise of private credit itself became one of the clearest signs that post-crisis banking rules had fundamentally reshaped corporate finance.

Critics, however, warn that the rollback carries real risks.

Former Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr, who previously held Bowman’s role, has argued that weaker capital standards could leave the banking system more vulnerable during future periods of stress. Critics point to the collapses of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic Bank in 2023 as evidence that banking instability remains a genuine threat even after years of reform.

Bowman has rejected that argument, contending that U.S. banks remain substantially better capitalized than they were before the 2008 crisis and that excessive regulation has become a greater threat to growth than bank fragility itself.

The Trump administration has aligned closely with that view.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has framed the banking-rule rollback as part of a broader strategy to stimulate economic growth without relying entirely on Federal Reserve rate cuts. The logic is straightforward: if banks lend more aggressively, economic activity accelerates without requiring monetary policy alone to support growth.

Wall Street is already responding.

Bank stocks have broadly outperformed the wider market since Bowman assumed the Fed supervision role last June. The Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund and the SPDR S&P Bank ETF have both gained faster than the S&P 500 over the past year as investors anticipate larger dividends, expanded share buybacks, and stronger lending growth.

International regulators are now watching closely as well. European and Asian policymakers face increasing pressure to determine whether they should follow Washington’s lead or risk placing their own financial institutions at a competitive disadvantage globally.

For everyday Americans, the implications are increasingly direct.

The nation’s largest banks are about to have significantly more money available for mortgages, business loans, infrastructure financing, and corporate expansion. That could support economic growth, improve credit availability, and accelerate investment across sectors ranging from housing to artificial intelligence.

It could also mean operating with thinner safety margins than the system maintained during much of the post-2008 era.

Whether that trade-off ultimately strengthens the economy or creates new long-term financial vulnerabilities may define the next chapter of American banking.

© 2026 JBizNews. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.

Taiwan has officially overtaken India to become the fifth-largest stock market in the world, a remarkable shift driven almost entirely by the global artificial intelligence boom and the explosive rise of semiconductor giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).

Bloomberg market data published Monday showed Taiwan’s total stock-market capitalization reached approximately $4.95 trillion, narrowly surpassing India’s $4.92 trillion. Taiwan’s benchmark TAIEX index climbed to a record 44,097 points Tuesday morning, cementing the island’s new position behind only the United States, China, Japan, and Hong Kong in global equity-market rankings.

The reversal is extraordinary given the scale difference between the two economies.

Taiwan has a population of roughly 23 million people and an economy worth under $1 trillion. India has approximately 1.4 billion people and an economy more than four times larger. Yet Taiwan’s market has surged ahead because of one company dominating the center of the AI economy.

TSMC alone now represents roughly 42% of Taiwan’s total stock market value.

The company’s shares have surged nearly 50% this year as investors continue pouring money into businesses tied to artificial intelligence infrastructure. TSMC manufactures the advanced semiconductors powering AI systems used by companies including Nvidia, Apple, Advanced Micro Devices, Broadcom, Qualcomm, Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta Platforms.

The company is widely estimated to produce roughly 90% of the world’s most advanced chips — semiconductors essential for AI data centers, cloud computing, smartphones, autonomous systems, and advanced defense technologies.

As global AI spending accelerates, demand for TSMC’s manufacturing capacity has exploded alongside it.

TSMC Chief Executive C.C. Wei has repeatedly said the company remains effectively sold out at the high end of production, with customer demand continuing to exceed available supply despite aggressive expansion efforts.

The company is currently building or expanding manufacturing facilities in Arizona, Japan, and Germany, backed by billions of dollars in incentives and industrial-support programs from governments eager to secure domestic semiconductor production.

Even so, the most advanced chips in the world continue to be produced overwhelmingly inside Taiwan itself.

Taiwan’s government has also actively supported the rally.

Last month, Taiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission relaxed concentration rules for domestic mutual funds, allowing investment funds focused on Taiwanese equities to allocate up to 25% of assets into a single stock if that company represents more than 10% of the broader market.

At present, TSMC is the only company qualifying under the revised rules.

Analysts at JPMorgan Chase estimated the regulatory change alone could attract more than $6 billion in additional inflows into Taiwanese equities over the coming months, further strengthening demand for TSMC shares.

India, meanwhile, has moved in the opposite direction.

According to Bloomberg data, foreign investors have withdrawn roughly $24 billion from Indian equities so far this year amid slowing corporate earnings growth, weakness in the rupee, and the global rotation toward AI-linked investments concentrated in semiconductor-heavy markets like Taiwan and South Korea.

The reversal has been rapid. Just two years ago, India’s stock market was nearly three times the size of Taiwan’s.

TSMC itself is now valued at more than $1 trillion, placing it among the most valuable companies in the world and reinforcing how deeply the AI boom has concentrated market gains into a relatively small number of semiconductor leaders.

But Taiwan’s success also exposes its greatest vulnerability.

Because such a large share of the country’s stock market depends on one company and one industry, any slowdown in AI spending, production disruption, or geopolitical instability could trigger severe market volatility.

The geopolitical risk remains especially significant given tensions between Taiwan and China.

Beijing continues to claim Taiwan as part of its territory and has never ruled out the use of force to achieve reunification. Semiconductor security and U.S. support for Taiwan remained a major topic during recent meetings between President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping earlier this month in Beijing.

Taiwanese officials have publicly welcomed the market milestone while also acknowledging the risks of excessive dependence on semiconductors.

Premier Cho Jung-tai has urged policymakers to accelerate investment in industries including electric vehicles, biotechnology, and green energy in an effort to broaden Taiwan’s economic base beyond chips.

Those diversification efforts, however, remain in relatively early stages.

For India, the loss of fifth place arrives at a politically difficult moment.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government has aggressively promoted manufacturing expansion and semiconductor investment initiatives aimed at reducing reliance on imports and building a domestic chip ecosystem. But replicating Taiwan’s semiconductor infrastructure — built over four decades with deep engineering specialization and global supply-chain integration — remains enormously difficult.

India’s stock market still ranks among the world’s largest emerging-market exchanges, but momentum has increasingly shifted toward AI-linked economies and semiconductor-heavy markets tied directly to the global computing buildout.

TSMC shares are expected to resume trading Wednesday in Taipei following Tuesday’s record close.

For now, the rise of a single company has fundamentally reshaped global stock-market rankings — and transformed Taiwan into one of the central financial winners of the artificial intelligence era.

JBizNews Desk — Asia

© 2026 JBizNews. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.

JbizNews —Frankfurt — The European Central Bank must proceed with an interest rate hike at its upcoming June monetary policy meeting regardless of whether ongoing diplomatic negotiations yield a peace deal in the Middle East, according to an explicit policy directive issued on May 26, 2026. ECB Executive Board Member Isabel Schnabel warned that the protracted geopolitical conflict in Iran has inflicted structural damage on the continent’s commercial pipeline, forcing a sharp upward revision in long-term inflation modeling. The central bank’s hardening stance signals that policymakers are preparing to prioritize structural price stability even as external energy shocks rapidly depress corporate profitability and squeeze aggregate consumer demand across the currency bloc.

The hawkish policy maneuver arrives on the heels of the European Commission’s official Spring 2026 Economic Forecast, which systematically downgraded Eurozone gross domestic product (GDP) expansion metrics while accelerating inflation targets. Under the newly calibrated baseline, real GDP growth across the EU is projected to contract to a sluggish 1.1% this year, while the core Eurozone is expected to post a meager 0.9% expansion. Simultaneously, widespread commodity volatility has driven projected headline inflation up by a full percentage point to 3.1% for the current calendar year. This restrictive macroeconomic environment is being directly exacerbated by a severe supply-side disruption following the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which triggered a 50% spike in regional wholesale natural gas prices and a 65% surge in crude oil baselines between late February and the end of April.

For institutional market participants, the intersection of rising borrow costs and sticky input liabilities is triggering a notable contraction in industrial capital expenditure. European Commission forecasters noted that elevated sovereign yields are compounding corporate debt service burdens, pushing multi-national enterprises to alter near-term hiring and capital expansion plans. While nominal wage pressure remains highly elevated as regional labor unions seek compensation for eroding purchasing power, corporate operating margins are contracting under the weight of utility overhead. Commercial analysts at MUFG Research underscored that because domestic household savings buffers have been largely exhausted over the prior cyclical cycle, private consumption can no longer be relied upon to insulate corporate revenues from broader macroeconomic compression.

The structural fiscal health of member state governments is also fracturing under the financial burden of managing national energy grid interventions. Aggregate public sector deficits across the trading bloc are now anticipated to expand from 3.1% of GDP last year to 3.6% over the medium term. This widening budgetary mismatch is set to push the total EU debt-to-GDP ratio from 82.8% to 84.2% before the conclusion of the fiscal year, with core sovereign weights in the Eurozone hitting a more severe 90.2%. The expanding debt load is being further aggravated by an unfavorable, widening interest-growth differential that increases the long-term cost of rolling over outstanding government securities.

On the commercial labor front, the protracted tightening of the continental labor market has officially peaked. Institutional payroll modeling indicates that aggregate employment growth across the European Union will decelerate sharply to 0.3% this year, a noticeable decline from the 0.5% pace recorded during the prior expansionary leg. Total unemployment is projected to solidify at 6.0%, effectively halting a multi-year downward trajectory that had previously acted as a key pillar of support for corporate services and domestic retail spending.

Despite the prevailing headwinds, certain counter-cyclical sectors are showing strong structural resilience. Public sector capital outlays directed toward defense procurement and localized green energy infrastructure grids are expected to remain highly robust, partially mitigating the capital flight observed in private commercial real estate and residential construction markets. Furthermore, corporate investments into advanced generative artificial intelligence platforms are being cited by institutional economists as a primary supply-side tailwind that could unlock latent industrial productivity, provided that private enterprise implementation can bypass building regulatory friction within the Brussels legislative apparatus.

JBizNews Desk

© JBizNews.com. All rights reserved. This article is original reporting by JBizNews Desk. Unauthorized reproduction or redistribution is strictly prohibited.

By JBizNews Desk

NEW YORK, May 24, 2026 — For decades, one rule defined global finance during geopolitical crises: when war broke out, investors bought U.S. Treasury bonds.

That rule is now being tested in ways Wall Street has not seen in a generation.

Instead of rallying during the Iran conflict, the Treasury market has sold off sharply. Bond prices have fallen, yields have surged, and the world’s largest safe-haven asset class is suddenly behaving less like a shelter and more like an inflation trade.

The reason is straightforward but deeply consequential: investors no longer fear recession first. They fear inflation first.

The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield, the benchmark interest rate underpinning nearly every major borrowing cost in the American economy, climbed to roughly 4.60% this week after briefly touching a 16-month high near 4.7%. Since the Iran war escalated in late February, yields have risen approximately 70 basis points — an unusually large move for sovereign debt markets.

Historically, wars triggered the opposite reaction. Investors typically fled into Treasuries during global instability, pushing yields lower as bond prices rose. That relationship held through the Gulf War, the Iraq invasion, the September 11 attacks, the European debt crisis, and much of the pandemic era.

This time, the inflation shock is overpowering the traditional safety trade.

Energy markets sit at the center of the disruption. A substantial share of global oil and fertilizer shipments move through the Strait of Hormuz, and continued instability surrounding the corridor has amplified fears of prolonged supply disruptions and structurally higher energy costs.

The economic consequences are already spreading globally. Airlines across Europe have reduced or rerouted flights due to elevated fuel costs and regional security concerns. American consumers have spent tens of billions more on gasoline this year compared with prewar expectations. Agricultural markets across Asia are dealing with rising fertilizer uncertainty that could ultimately feed back into global food inflation.

Every one of those pressures flows into the same market calculation: persistent inflation reduces the Federal Reserve’s ability to lower interest rates.

That concern is now clearly visible in inflation-expectation markets. The one-year Treasury breakeven inflation rate has climbed above 3%, while medium-term inflation expectations remain materially above the Federal Reserve’s formal 2% target.

Translated into everyday terms, bond investors increasingly believe the inflation environment of the early 2020s is not fully gone.

That matters far beyond Wall Street.

The 10-year Treasury yield directly influences mortgage rates, auto financing, corporate borrowing costs, commercial real estate lending, and the federal government’s own debt-service expenses. When yields rise and remain elevated, borrowing costs throughout the economy reset higher.

The housing market has already absorbed much of the impact. Freddie Mac’s average 30-year mortgage rate has remained above 7% for most of 2026, contributing to one of the slowest housing turnover environments in years. Home affordability has deteriorated sharply, refinancing activity has collapsed, and existing homeowners remain reluctant to sell properties tied to older low-rate mortgages.

The Federal Reserve has also become increasingly constrained.

Minutes from the Fed’s latest policy meeting showed policymakers remain concerned that inflation could reaccelerate if energy prices remain elevated through the second half of the year. Interest-rate futures markets now reflect rising expectations that the central bank may need to maintain restrictive policy longer than investors anticipated only months ago.

At the start of 2026, traders debated how quickly the Fed might begin easing. The conversation has shifted toward whether another rate increase could eventually become necessary.

The pressure extends beyond inflation alone.

Governments worldwide are issuing record amounts of debt at the same moment central banks are no longer acting as dominant buyers. According to OECD estimates, member governments issued roughly $17 trillion in sovereign debt during 2025, with issuance expected to rise further in 2026. U.S. federal debt has now crossed $39 trillion.

That creates a structural supply problem inside global bond markets: more debt must be absorbed by private investors precisely when inflation uncertainty is increasing the compensation investors demand to hold long-duration bonds.

Foreign reserve managers are also behaving differently than in past crises.

For much of the modern era, geopolitical instability automatically strengthened demand for U.S. Treasuries and the dollar. While the dollar remains dominant globally, reserve diversification has accelerated in recent years. Gold prices have repeatedly reached record highs during the Iran conflict, while several foreign central banks have gradually reduced reliance on long-dated U.S. government debt.

China’s sovereign bond market, notably, has remained comparatively stable during the conflict, underscoring how fragmented global capital flows have become compared with prior decades.

Markets increasingly view the path of oil prices as the key variable determining whether Treasuries can stabilize.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly argued that a negotiated Iran framework capable of restoring normal energy flows through Hormuz would rapidly ease inflation pressures. Administration officials have signaled that discussions remain active, though no finalized agreement has yet emerged.

If energy prices retreat materially, inflation expectations could ease and Treasury markets may begin behaving more traditionally again, with yields stabilizing or falling as geopolitical risk subsides.

If not, bond investors appear increasingly willing to price a world defined by structurally higher inflation, tighter monetary policy, and permanently elevated borrowing costs.

What makes the moment historically significant is not simply the Iran war itself.

It is the possibility that the foundational assumption underpinning modern finance — that U.S. Treasuries automatically function as the ultimate global refuge during crises — is no longer operating as reliably as it once did.

For now, the bond market’s message is clear: inflation risk has become powerful enough to overpower fear itself.

JBizNews Desk

© 2026 JBizNews. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.

Crude carriers shifted into position near the Strait of Hormuz on Sunday, May 24, 2026, after President Donald Trump declared over the weekend that a framework deal with Iran to reopen the world’s most consequential energy corridor has been “largely negotiated” and will be unveiled imminently — even as Tehran publicly contested his version of events and tanker operators kept crews on hold pending a formal end to hostilities.

In a Saturday social-media post, Trump described the agreement as “subject to finalization between the United States of America, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the various other Countries.” Iran’s Foreign Ministry said the two sides had locked in a memorandum of understanding as a first phase, with deeper negotiations to unfold over the following 30 to 60 days. A senior Iranian official, outlining the first-phase terms, said Tehran will return the Strait of Hormuz to pre-war operating conditions, underwrite shipping security through the waterway, give assurances that it will not pursue nuclear weapons, and resume exports of its own fuel and crude. The same official stressed that Iran has not agreed to hand over its enriched uranium stockpile, and that the nuclear question has been carved out for phase two.

Tehran’s counter-messaging muddied the picture almost instantly. Fars news agency reported that the Strait of Hormuz will stay under Iranian management and dismissed Trump’s framing as “incomplete and inconsistent with reality.” Iran’s chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf struck a similar note after the latest round of talks, warning that Tehran “will not back down from the rights of our nation and country — especially when dealing with a party that has never shown sincerity.” Traders have seen this movie before: at least two prior reopening declarations during the war unraveled within days.

The Strait of Hormuz has been functionally closed to commercial transit since late February, when U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran set off a cascade of Iranian retaliatory measures that throttled tanker movement to roughly five percent of its normal pace. The corridor moves about a fifth of the world’s daily crude shipments and a comparable slice of global LNG. General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, confirmed earlier this month that 22,500 mariners are stranded on more than 1,550 commercial ships trapped in and around the Gulf. Maersk, MSC, CMA CGM and Hapag-Lloyd halted transits in the conflict’s opening days and have yet to resume full service.

Vessel-tracking firm Kpler said crude carriers idling north of Dubai and Fujairah began nudging toward the chokepoint within hours of the weekend announcement — a near-repeat of April’s aborted reopening, when at least eight tankers advanced before the corridor refroze. Roughly 130 million barrels of crude and 46 million barrels of refined fuels are currently floating on some 200 tankers across the region, according to Kpler data, a backlog that would surge into global markets the moment flows truly restart.

Futures markets are already pricing the optionality. Brent crude has swung in a band between roughly $100 and $144 a barrel for nearly three months, settling near $105 last week, while North Sea Dated changed hands around $110 in early May. JPMorgan analysts, who had penciled in a June restart, now project oil will average $97 a barrel for the balance of 2026 if the strait reopens on track. Citigroup energy strategists Anthony Yuen and Eric Lee had earlier flagged that any closure would deliver a sharp but compressed spike, since every major economy is incentivized to restore flows. Michael Green, chief strategist at Simplify Asset Management, notes that Brent historically needs to hold near $60 a barrel before U.S. pump prices retreat to roughly $3 a gallon — a level still well south of where the market is trading.

The operational hurdle is steeper than the diplomatic one. Matt Wright, principal freight analyst at Kpler, said shipowners remain unwilling to send crews back into the corridor on a political signal alone. War-risk insurance premiums, which ran at about 0.25 percent of hull value before the conflict, have leapt to between three and eight percent — equating to $3 million to $8 million in coverage costs for a single very large crude carrier transit, according to Marsh Risk war leader Dylan Saunders-Mortimer. VLCC freight rates from the Gulf to China have spiked in recent sessions, with Kpler clocking a 24 percent single-day jump to $1.67 per barrel — the steepest move of the year. The U.S. International Development Finance Corporation has been assembling a $20 billion reinsurance facility intended to draw tanker operators back, but the program’s terms remain unsettled.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking in New Delhi on Saturday, reiterated that any final accord must reopen Hormuz toll-free, halt Iran’s nuclear weapons pursuit, and secure the transfer of enriched uranium. “This problem will be solved, as the president’s made clear, one way or the other,” Rubio said.

For corporate America, even a partial restart would ease pressure that has bled into every corner of the consumer economy. U.S. inflation has held at multi-year highs since the conflict began, gasoline prices have spiked, ocean-freight costs have lifted everything from manufacturing inputs to imported food, and supply chains have absorbed a parallel hit from the Red Sea. OPEC trimmed its 2026 global demand growth forecast to 1.17 million barrels per day in its May report, down from 1.38 million, citing the conflict’s drag on trade.

Even under the cleanest possible path — a finalized phase-one accord, Iranian compliance on safe passage, sustained U.S. and allied naval reassurance, and tanker operators willing to put crews and hulls back in harm’s way — the International Energy Agency and Wall Street energy desks expect Hormuz throughput to stay below pre-war norms well into the third quarter. Stranded barrels will hit the market first; restoring production at Saudi, Emirati, Iraqi and Kuwaiti loading facilities, and rebuilding the depleted floating-storage and onshore inventories the war has burned through, will take months, not weeks.

The next 72 hours will tell the market whether this is, at last, the real reopening — or another false start in a war that has produced several already.

JBizNews Desk

© 2026 JBizNews. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.